[first pass]                        221
[Pottawattamie HC Conf Min LR 1764 21                             /    Lr1764 21 folder 1 Pottawattamie HC Lr 1764 21 fd 1 July 46-Feb 51    LR 1764 21 1846 July-1851 February_Page_232 ]
for bringing the Gold there was the
payment of the cow and the putting out the
 Boy would amount to some expense and
that it was his mind that Sister Martin
rerceive her  necessary pay for her expences
in sending out a team & wagon.
Council Bulkley said that Sister Martin had
sacrificed property & had not received renumeration
She gave up Ben, wagon & 12 dollars to fit W^m
Mitchel off- That Sister Hambllin did nothing
to fit him off with all all he wondered
She claimed any Gold at all and in his opinion
the Gold belonged to Sister Martin- a Boy at 7 or 8
years[========]earns his living. Sister Martin
found his clothing- Councillor Benson said
that Sister Martin has thrown in property only to
the amount of 10 dollars that no claims had been
made for t he 12 dollars . Sister Hamblin has claimed
for 1 1/2 for the Boys keeping. That he knew
for had Boys, that keeping Boys at that age
was unprofitable. That the settlement of standing
and open a/c we had nothing to do with Sister
Hamblin disputes the High charge made on many
of the articles in the bill presented by Sister Martin
Pres^t Hyde said this case is a difficult matter
The charger on the 1st [=====] I think Sister Martin
has the first bona fide claim to the Gold dust
2   I think there is some claim for sister Hamblin
for the Boy going to school and the time
would exclude much advasitage arising from
his labour and now the thing to decide is how
it shall be. The amount was 84 dollars. She
Sister Martin has owe 4.5,50, The Oxen were
worth 30 dollars  The wagon was worth 50
here. And 10 dollars Mitchel received after the
flour was left to Sister Martin. The Boys keeping